We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze traffic. In addition, we provide social media, advertising, and analytics partners with information about how you use our website. If you continue to use our website, you agree to our cookies.
Home  >  Tyre test reviews by consumers for consumers  >  Car summer tyres test reviews  >  Hankook test reviews  >  VENTUSV12EVOK110 tyre reviews

VENTUSV12EVOK110 tyre reviews


We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.


To the shop categories:  Car summer tyres

VENTUSV12EVOK110 tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow

 Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 46 test results
Ø 11,835,952 km driven

Score

Buy and information VENTUSV12EVOK110


08.08.2012 from  Bryan Note  4.3
(11,265 km driven)
  • Grip in dry conditions
  • Braking in dry conditions
  • Grip in wet conditions
  • Braking in wet conditions
  • Grip in snow
  • Driving comfort
  • Internal noise level
  • Tyre wear
  • Fuel consumption  N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 40 R18
Mazda Mazdaspeed3
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Good tire all around for a good price. Sidewall is slightly softer than what some may like.

18.05.2012 from  Note  3.8
(53,108 km driven)
  • Grip in dry conditions
  • Braking in dry conditions
  • Grip in wet conditions  N/A
  • Braking in wet conditions
  • Grip in snow
  • Driving comfort
  • Internal noise level
  • Tyre wear
  • Fuel consumption  N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
225 / 45 R17
Subaru WRX
Result: Would you buy again? No way
Comment:
These tires are in no way, shape, or form any sort of 'performance tire' They are a 'good' touring tire ONLY. I hated them until I realized that they were not any kind of performance tire.

29.04.2012 from  Patrick Brass Note  4.2
(1,609 km driven)
  • Grip in dry conditions
  • Braking in dry conditions
  • Grip in wet conditions  N/A
  • Braking in wet conditions
  • Grip in snow
  • Driving comfort
  • Internal noise level
  • Tyre wear
  • Fuel consumption  N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
265 / 35 R18 ZR
Lexus SC 400
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Replaced with these over the Falken 452 that was previously on. Better grip, quieter, smoother ride. Hope to get 25k miles out of rears, and about 30 out of fronts.

15.02.2012 from  MNJ Note  4.3
(48,000 km driven)
  • Grip in dry conditions
  • Braking in dry conditions
  • Grip in wet conditions
  • Braking in wet conditions
  • Grip in snow
  • Driving comfort
  • Internal noise level
  • Tyre wear
  • Fuel consumption  N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 45 R18 ZR
Peugeot 2.7 GT Coupe
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
What can I say ? Excellent in the dry, excellent in the wet. I drive nearly 1,000Km per week and have always felt safe and secure at high speeds with these tyres. I would have liked them to last a little bit longer as after 48,000Km they are down to 1mm and need replacing. My work colleague reckons his Contis are still going after 91,000Km :( In the recent winter conditions the Hankooks still felt stable although I did feel a "twitch" from the rears a couple of times. However, they still felt safe. Overall: Highly Recommended

‹
›
Free shipping
Over 2,101 fitting station partners
30 days return policy
Payment Methods
mobilemech-shop.co.uk - an offer by Delticom AG